Expandable Graphite vs Magnesium Hydroxide (MDH): Technical Comparison and Application Guidance

Overview: MDH and Expandable Graphite

Magnesium Hydroxide (MDH, Mg(OH)₂) decomposes endothermically around 300–350 °C, releasing water vapor and producing magnesium oxide (MgO) residue. MDH is widely used as a halogen-free flame retardant, commonly in thermoplastics, elastomers and cable compounds.

Expandable Graphite (EG) operates via physical expansion to form insulating vermicular char, effective in coatings, foams and intumescent systems.

Mechanisms of action: endothermic vs intumescent barrier

• MDH (endothermic):

• Absorbs heat during decomposition and releases water vapor, cooling the surface and diluting combustible gases.

• Leaves inorganic MgO residue which can act as a thermal barrier but generally lacks structural intumescence.

• EG (intumescent/physical):

• Rapidly expands and forms a thick, insulating carbon char that physically blocks heat and oxygen, providing mechanical char strength.

Fire performance: heat sink, char formation and smoke

• Heat absorption: MDH offers strong heat sink effect due to high heat of decomposition; effective in slowing temperature rise, particularly in bulk polymer systems.

• Char & insulation: EG produces cohesive char with high insulating performance; MDH residue is more powdery and less mechanically robust.

• Smoke control: EG often reduces smoke generation by trapping volatiles. MDH does not inherently suppress smoke and in some cases decomposition products can contribute to aerosolized particles.

Loading ranges and effects on properties

• MDH: often requires high loadings (30–60 wt%) for effective flame retardancy; this increases stiffness and density and may require processing adjustments.

• EG: effective at moderate to low loadings depending on expansion characteristics; optimized EG grades can reduce required loadings versus MDH for similar end-use performance profiles.

Processing considerations and equipment impact

• MDH:

• Abrasive but less so than ATH; may increase wear on screws and dies at high concentrations.

• High loading increases melt viscosity; may require higher processing temperatures and torque.

• EG:

• Must be dispersed carefully to avoid flake agglomeration; particle integrity influences performance.

• Does not decompose during standard processing; expansion occurs at fire exposure.

Environmental and toxicological aspects

• Both MDH and EG are considered halogen-free and generally low in toxicity. MDH decomposes to MgO (stable oxide). EG is carbon-based and inert; dust handling precautions apply.

Application matrix: where each excels

• MDH excels in bulk thermoplastics and elastomers where endothermic cooling and high loadings are acceptable (e.g., cable compounds, dense polyolefins).

• EG excels in intumescent coatings, PU foam and applications needing low smoke and mechanically stable char (e.g., construction coatings, sealing materials).

Selection steps and practical advice

1. Evaluate target substrate and required fire rating (e.g., flame spread, smoke density).

2. Consider mechanical/property trade-offs at intended loading levels.

3. Run pilot formulations with representative loadings: MDH high-loading formulations vs EG low/medium-loading systems.

4. Assess smoke evolution and char mechanical integrity under relevant test methods.

5. Consider hybrid formulations (MDH + EG or MDH + other char promoters) to balance heat sink and char formation.

Conclusion & CTA

MDH and EG serve complementary roles in halogen-free flame retardancy. MDH provides robust endothermic heat absorption for bulk systems but requires high loadings; EG provides intumescent, low-smoke protection with structurally stable char at often lower loadings. Selection should be application-driven and validated through pilot testing.

Request samples, MDH/EG comparative TDS, or trial support: [INSERT CONTACT FORM URL] | Email: sales@graphitezone.com

Two-column quick comparison table (MDH vs EG)